Главная
Об институте
Авторефераты диссертаций
Научные публикации
Аспирантура
Профсоюз
Контакты
КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПОДХОДЫ К СОЦИАЛЬНОМУ ИЗМЕРЕНИЮ УСТОЙЧИВОГО РАЗВИТИЯ CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Вяльшина А.А., к.социол.н., ИАгП РАН Vyalshina A.A., candidate of sociological sciences, IAgP RAS
В статье представлен обзор основных концептуальных подходов к исследованию социального измерения устойчивого развития. Вводится понятие «социальной устойчивости». Рассмотрены основные концепты, понятия и индикаторы, характерные для разных подходов, способствующие углубленному изучению социальной устойчивости на разных уровнях (на уровне общества, локальных сообществ). Сделан вывод о том, что понимание теоретико-методологических основ данных подходов позволит разработать концептуальный аппарат изучения социальной устойчивости, а также будет способствовать обоснованию и разработке эффективных мер социального управления. The article provides an overview of the main conceptual approaches to researching the social dimension of sustainable development. The concept of «social sustainability» is introduced. The main concepts, categories, and indicators characteristic of different approaches that contribute to an in-depth study of social sustainability at different levels (societal and local community levels) are examined. It is concluded that understanding the theoretical and methodological foundations of these approaches will allow for the development of a conceptual framework for studying social sustainability and will contribute to the substantiation and development of effective social management measures.
Ключевые слова: устойчивое развитие, социальная устойчивость, концептуальные подходы, социальные аспекты Keywords: sustainable development, social sustainability, conceptual approaches, social aspects
Список источников
1. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations
2. Littig B., Griessler E. (2005). Social Sustainability: A Catchword Between Political Pragmatism and Social Theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8, no. 1/2: 65–79.
3. Ballet J., Bazin D., Mahieu F.-R. (2020). A Policy Framework for Social Sustainability: Social Cohesion, Equity and Safety. Sustainable Development 28: 1388–1394.
4. Vinthagen, S. (2013). Ten theses on why we need a «Social Science Panel on Climate Change». An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 12, 1: 155–176.
5. Broman G., Robèrt K-H. (2015). A Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production.
6. Eizenberg E., Jabareen Y. (2017). Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework. Sustainability, 9, 68.
7. Missimer M. (2015). Social Sustainability within the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development. (Doctoral Dissertation). Blekinge Institute of Technology.
8. Missimer M., Robèrt K.-H., Broman G. (2017). A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 1: exploring the social system. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 140, Part 1, Pages 32-41.
9. Walker B., Holling C., Carpenter S., Kinzig A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9 (2), p. 5.
10. Mayer R., Norman P. (2004). Exploring Attributes Of Trustworthiness: A Classroom Exercise. Journal of Management Education. 28, pp.224-249.
11. Schutz, W. (1992). Beyond FIRO-B - Three New Theory Derived Measures - Element B: Behavior, Element F: Feelings, Element S: Self. Psychological Reports. 70, pp.915-937.
12. Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability. Sustainability Science Practice and Policy. 8, 3–14. 12.
13. Abbott J. (2005). Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 24, 237–251.
14. Jabareen Y. (2015). The Risk City: Cities Countering Climate Change: Emerging Planning Theories and Practices around the World; Springer: New York, NY, USA.
15. Jabareen Y. (2006). Sustainable Urban Forms Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 26, 38–52.
16. Larimian T., Sadeghi A. (2021). Measuring Urban Social Sustainability: Scale Development and Validation. EPB: Urban Analytics and City Science 48 (4): 621–637.
17. Shirazi R., Keivani R., Brownhill S., Watson G. (2020). Promoting Social Sustainability of Urban Neighbourhoods. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1–25.
18. Hofstad H. (2023). Well understood? A literature study defining and operationalising community social sustainability. The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability. Volume 28, - Issue 9. P. 1193-1209.
19. Vallance, S., Perkins H., Dixon J. (2011). What is Social Sustainability? A Clarification of Concepts. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences. 42 (3): 342–348.
 References
1. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations
2. Littig B., Griessler E. (2005). Social Sustainability: A Catchword Between Political Pragmatism and Social Theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8, no. 1/2: 65–79.
3. Ballet J., Bazin D., Mahieu F.-R. (2020). A Policy Framework for Social Sustainability: Social Cohesion, Equity and Safety. Sustainable Development 28: 1388–1394.
4. Vinthagen, S. (2013). Ten theses on why we need a «Social Science Panel on Climate Change». An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 12, 1: 155–176.
5. Broman G., Robèrt K-H. (2015). A Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production.
6. Eizenberg E., Jabareen Y. (2017). Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework. Sustainability, 9, 68.
7. Missimer M. (2015). Social Sustainability within the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development. (Doctoral Dissertation). Blekinge Institute of Technology.
8. Missimer M., Robèrt K.-H., Broman G. (2017). A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 1: exploring the social system. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 140, Part 1, Pages 32-41.
9. Walker B., Holling C., Carpenter S., Kinzig A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9 (2), p. 5.
10. Mayer R., Norman P. (2004). Exploring Attributes Of Trustworthiness: A Classroom Exercise. Journal of Management Education. 28, pp.224-249.
11. Schutz, W. (1992). Beyond FIRO-B - Three New Theory Derived Measures - Element B: Behavior, Element F: Feelings, Element S: Self. Psychological Reports. 70, pp.915-937.
12. Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability. Sustainability Science Practice and Policy. 8, 3–14. 12.
13. Abbott J. (2005). Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 24, 237–251.
14. Jabareen Y. (2015). The Risk City: Cities Countering Climate Change: Emerging Planning Theories and Practices around the World; Springer: New York, NY, USA.
15. Jabareen Y. (2006). Sustainable Urban Forms Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 26, 38–52.
16. Larimian T., Sadeghi A. (2021). Measuring Urban Social Sustainability: Scale Development and Validation. EPB: Urban Analytics and City Science 48 (4): 621–637.
17. Shirazi R., Keivani R., Brownhill S., Watson G. (2020). Promoting Social Sustainability of Urban Neighbourhoods. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1–25.
18. Hofstad H. (2023). Well understood? A literature study defining and operationalising community social sustainability. The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability. Volume 28, - Issue 9. P. 1193-1209.
19. Vallance, S., Perkins H., Dixon J. (2011). What is Social Sustainability? A Clarification of Concepts. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences. 42 (3): 342–348.
Скачать файл: Скачать